Skip to content
Substrata
Join

Global Resource Map – Location, Production, and Supply-Chain Connections

Hydropower · Production, 2024
  • 0–1%
  • 1%–5%
  • 5%–10%
  • 10%–25%
  • ≥ 25%
  • Not listed

Share of the world total, 4,511.889 TWh (terawatt-hours).

Source: EIA International Energy StatisticsSource: EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21, Hydroelectricity net generation, annual (series INTL.33-12-<ISO3>-BKWH.A)

South America · CL

Chile

Hydropower 26 TWh · 0.58% of world

×

Role in the chains: extraction

Natural resources, measured

Ordered by the country’s largest How this is computedA country's resources are ordered by its largest share of world output on any production column of each table (e.g. palladium within PGMs).Method →Code →. Values are USGS (minerals) or EIA (energy); an “e” marks a USGS estimate.

Hydropower 26th (Computed: Position of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.) · 0.6% (Computed: A place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.) of production, 2024
MeasureValueYear beforeWorld standing
Production2024 · terawatt-hoursSourcedEIA International Energy Statistics, EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21 · 2024Open the source →2023: 23.302 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 153 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Not in the sources read: producers (USGS 2019 country chapter, corpus) · constraints or changes (USGS, accepted events) · export restrictions (OECD 2024) · EU or US sanctions naming it.

EIA International Energy Statistics, EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21, Hydroelectricity net generation, annual (series INTL.33-12-<ISO3>-BKWH.A) (billion kilowatthours). Source ↗ World ranking →

Copper 1st (Computed: Position of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.) · 23% (Computed: A place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.) of mine production, 2025
MeasureValueYear beforeWorld standing
Mine production2025 · thousand tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →2024: 5,510 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 14 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
Refinery production2025 · thousand tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →2024: 1,940 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 17 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
Reserves2025 · thousand tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →Year before: —World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 14 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Reserves ÷ 2025 production: How this is computedPublished reserves ÷ annual production, same place, unit and year.Method →Code → at that rate. Reserves are what is economic to extract now (roughly proved + probable), not all that exists; they move with price and technology.

Who produces it

  • Anglo American Sur S.A. (Anglo American plc, 50.1%; Mitsubishi Corp., 20.4%; Corporación Nacional del Cobre (CODELCO), 20%; Mitsui & Co., Ltd., 9.5%) — copper, cu content, Los Bronces Mine and SX-EW1 plant, Metropolitana (Santiago) Region capacity 40 thousand metric tons
  • Antofagasta Plc, 50%, and Barrick Gold Corp., 50% — copper, cu content, Zaldívar Mine and SX-EW1 plant, Antofagasta Region capacity 100 thousand metric tons
  • Antofagasta Plc, 70%, and Marubeni Corp., 30% — copper, cu content, Antucoya Mine and SX-EW1 plant, Antofagasta Region capacity 80 thousand metric tons
  • Antofagasta Plc, 70%, and Marubeni Corp., 30% — copper, cu content, Centinela Mine (El Tesoro) and SX-EW1 plant, Antofagasta Region capacity 90 thousand metric tons
  • Antofagasta Plc, 60%; JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corp., 25%; Mitsubishi Materials Corp., 15% — copper, cu content, Los Pelambres Mine, Coquimbo Region capacity 370 thousand metric tons
  • Compañía Contractual Minera Candelaria (Lundin Mining Corp., 80%; Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd., 15%; Sumitomo Corp., 5%) — copper, cu content, Candelaria Mine, Antacama Region capacity 160 thousand metric tons

USGS Minerals Yearbook 2019, Table 2. Structure of the mineral industry (Table 2), 27 more rows. Annual capacity in the unit USGS prints for each commodity. Chapter ↗ Table ↗

Export restrictions (OECD, 2024 data)

  • Fiscal tax on exports 10% on ore, intermediate, metal, scrap since 2019-09-26, until 2028-12-31 Legal text ↗

Not in the sources read: constraints or changes (USGS, accepted events) · EU or US sanctions naming it.

USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026), World Mine and Refinery Production and Reserves (Data in thousand metric tons, copper content). Source ↗ World ranking →

Lithium 3rd (Computed: Position of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.) · 19% (Computed: A place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.) of mine production, 2025
MeasureValueYear beforeWorld standing
Mine production2025 · tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →2024: 48,900 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 9 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
Reserves2025 · tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →Year before: —World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 10 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Reserves ÷ 2025 production: How this is computedPublished reserves ÷ annual production, same place, unit and year.Method →Code → at that rate. Reserves are what is economic to extract now (roughly proved + probable), not all that exists; they move with price and technology.

Who produces it

  • Rockwood Litio Ltda. (Albemarle Corp., 100%) — lithium carbonate, La Negra I and II plants, Antofagasta Region capacity 44,000 metric tons
  • SQM Salar S.A. [Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM), 100%] — lithium carbonate, Salar del Carmen plant, Antofagasta Region capacity 70,000 metric tons
  • Rockwood Litio Ltda. (Albemarle Corp., 100%) — lithium chloride, La Negra I and II plants, Antofagasta Region capacity 6,000 metric tons
  • SQM Salar S.A. [Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM), 100%] — lithium hydroxide, Salar del Carmen plant, Antofagasta Region capacity 13500 metric tons

USGS Minerals Yearbook 2019, Table 2. Structure of the mineral industry (Table 2). Annual capacity in the unit USGS prints for each commodity. Chapter ↗ Table ↗

Constraints and changes, as the sources state them

  • “Four brine operations in Argentina, seven mineral operations in Australia, one mineral operation in Brazil, two mineral operations in Canada, two brine operations Chile, nine mineral and six brine operations in China, two mineral operations in Mali, and five mineral operations in Zimbabwe accounted for the majority of world lithium production.” USGS ↗
  • “Despite some lithium producers reducing output or expansion projects being postponed in 2025 owing to low prices, significant production capacity expansions took place in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Mali, the United States, and Zimbabwe.” USGS ↗
  • “Brine-based lithium sources were in various stages of development or exploration in Argentina, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, China, and the United States; mineral-based lithium sources were in various stages of development or exploration in Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, China, Congo (Kinshasa), Czechia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Mali, Namibia, Nigeria, Peru, Portugal, Russia, Rwanda, Serbia, Spain, Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Zimbabwe; lithium-clay sources were in various stages of development or exploration in Mexico and the United States.” USGS ↗

Not in the sources read: export restrictions (OECD 2024) · EU or US sanctions naming it.

USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026), World Mine Production and Reserves (Data in metric tons, lithium content). Source ↗ World ranking →

Silver 5th (Computed: Position of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.) · 5.4% (Computed: A place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.) of mine production, 2025
MeasureValueYear beforeWorld standing
Mine production2025 · tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →2024: 1,200 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 14 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
Reserves2025 · tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →Year before: —World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 12 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Reserves ÷ 2025 production: How this is computedPublished reserves ÷ annual production, same place, unit and year.Method →Code → at that rate. Reserves are what is economic to extract now (roughly proved + probable), not all that exists; they move with price and technology.

Not in the sources read: producers (USGS 2019 country chapter, corpus) · constraints or changes (USGS, accepted events) · export restrictions (OECD 2024) · EU or US sanctions naming it.

USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026), World Mine Production and Reserves (Data in metric tons, silver content). Source ↗ World ranking →

Iron ore 13th (Computed: Position of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.) · 0.8% (Computed: A place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.) of mine production, iron content, 2025
MeasureValueYear beforeWorld standing
Mine production, usable ore2025 · thousand tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →2024: 18,000 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 17 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
Mine production, iron content2025 · thousand tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →2024: 11,000 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 17 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
Reserves (iron content)2025 · million tonnesSourcedUSGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026) · 2025Open the source →Year before: —World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 17 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Reserves ÷ 2025 production: How this is computedPublished reserves ÷ annual production, same place, unit and year.Method →Code → at that rate. Reserves are what is economic to extract now (roughly proved + probable), not all that exists; they move with price and technology.

Who produces it

  • Compañía Minera del Pacífico S.A. (CAP S.A., 75%, and Mitsubishi Corp., 25%) — iron ore, fe content, Cerro Negro Norte Mine and Magnetita plant, Atacama Region capacity 4000 thousand metric tons
  • Compañía Minera del Pacífico S.A. (CAP S.A., 75%, and Mitsubishi Corp., 25%) — iron ore, fe content, Los Colorados Mine and Pellets plant, Atacama Region capacity 10000 thousand metric tons
  • Compañía Minera del Pacífico S.A. (CAP S.A., 75%, and Mitsubishi Corp., 25%) — iron ore, fe content, El Romeral Mine, Coquimbo Region capacity 2000 thousand metric tons

USGS Minerals Yearbook 2019, Table 2. Structure of the mineral industry (Table 2). Annual capacity in the unit USGS prints for each commodity. Chapter ↗ Table ↗

Not in the sources read: constraints or changes (USGS, accepted events) · export restrictions (OECD 2024) · EU or US sanctions naming it.

USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (February 2026), World Mine Production and Reserves (Data in thousand metric tons, usable ore; reserves in million metric tons). Source ↗ World ranking →

Natural gas 66th (Computed: Position of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.) · <0.1% (Computed: A place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.) of production, 2024
MeasureValueYear beforeWorld standing
Production2024 · billion m³SourcedEIA International Energy Statistics, EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21 · 2024Open the source →2023: 1.362 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 96 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Not in the sources read: producers (USGS 2019 country chapter, corpus) · constraints or changes (USGS, accepted events) · export restrictions (OECD 2024) · EU or US sanctions naming it.

EIA International Energy Statistics, EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21, Dry natural gas, annual (series INTL.26-1-<ISO3>-BCM.A) (billion cubic metres). Source ↗ World ranking →

Oil 84th (Computed: Position of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.) · <0.1% (Computed: A place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.) of production, 2025
MeasureValueYear beforeWorld standing
Production2025 · thousand barrels a daySourcedEIA International Energy Statistics, EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21 · 2025Open the source →2024: 2.107 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 99 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Not in the sources read: producers (USGS 2019 country chapter, corpus) · constraints or changes (USGS, accepted events) · export restrictions (OECD 2024) · EU or US sanctions naming it.

EIA International Energy Statistics, EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21, Crude oil including lease condensate, annual (series INTL.57-1-<ISO3>-TBPD.A) (thousand barrels per day). Source ↗ World ranking →

Coal 63rd (Computed: Position of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.) · <0.1% (Computed: A place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.) of production, 2024
MeasureValueYear beforeWorld standing
Production2024 · thousand tonnesSourcedEIA International Energy Statistics, EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21 · 2024Open the source →2023: 121.57 (How this is computedLatest year ÷ the year before − 1, same country, same column of the same table (USGS or EIA).Method →Code →)World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 66 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
Reserves2023 · million short tonsSourcedEIA International Energy Statistics, EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21 · 2023Open the source →Year before: —World: How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Among 86 countries listed individually.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Not in the sources read: producers (USGS 2019 country chapter, corpus) · constraints or changes (USGS, accepted events) · export restrictions (OECD 2024) · EU or US sanctions naming it.

EIA International Energy Statistics, EIA international bulk file, updated 2026-09-21, Coal, annual (series INTL.7-1-<ISO3>-MT.A) (thousand metric tons; reserves in million short tons). Source ↗ World ranking →

Market access

Export restrictions it applies

SourcedOECD Inventory of Export Restrictions on Critical Raw Materials (2024 data)Open the source → measures recorded on copper — listed under each resource above.

Sanctions that name it

No EU regime and no OFAC country program. Thematic lists (terrorism, cyber, human rights) can still name its people and companies.

Read 2026-09-26 from the EU Sanctions Map and OFAC’s program list. A regime targets what its measures name — listed persons, goods, services — not the whole country. UK: gov.uk publishes each regime as prose, with no machine-readable list of measures per regime; not read.

Peers on copper

The other leading countries by mine production, 2025 (USGS/EIA); this country is How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code →.

  1. Congo (Kinshasa) How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  2. Peru How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  3. China How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  4. Russia How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  5. United States How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Peers on lithium

The other leading countries by mine production, 2025 (USGS/EIA); this country is How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code →.

  1. Australia How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  2. China How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  3. Zimbabwe How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  4. Argentina How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  5. Brazil How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Peers on silver

The other leading countries by mine production, 2025 (USGS/EIA); this country is How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code →.

  1. Mexico How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  2. Peru How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  3. China How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  4. Bolivia How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →
  5. Poland How this is computedPosition of a country when the countries USGS lists individually are sorted by the same column, largest first; equal values share a rank.Method →Code → · How this is computedA place's annual production ÷ the published world total, same unit and year.Method →Code →

Related bottlenecks

Connected

Ask about Chile →

Another country